My
feeling is that a submissive, before she/he ever gets near a relationship
needs to set up a very clear cut set of expectations and standards. The
sub needs to know, going in exactly what her/his wants and needs from
the relationship are and that includes the issues of monogoamy, polyamorous
and pansexuality.
The submissive also needs to establish
a standard as to what she/he is looking for in a Dominant. And this
means a realistic set of standards opposed to the "Knight in shinning
armor" image. And then they need to have the gumption to stick
to those standard while slogging through the chaff even though the "need
to experience" is burning them up.
A Dominant assumes responsibility
for the submissive. Assumes, meaning he or she knows what their obligation
is and has the maturity and responsibility to live up to those obligations.
Part of that obligation is to know, really know, what the submissive's
expectations and needs are as well as knowing what issues are problems
or may be abhorent to the sub.
Perhaps the best test a Dominant
can make when considering introducing a change into a relationship is
to ask " Is this in the best interest of my submissive and is her/his
welfare taken care of ? "
Granted that single question may seem at odds with the image of a Dominant.
We all define our own image, ideas and relationships. It does seem to
me, though, that if a Dominant is going to avail themselves of the perks
and privilages of the position that he/she also needs to shoulder the
duty and responsibility.
Most assuredly our limits change
as we grow and develop. A psychiatrist will tell us that we become a
new person psychologically every seven years. Anyone who has explored
the effects of pain on the human animal knows that tolerance to pain
grows with each exposure. Limits are an item that the submissive should
consider when looking at their expectations for the relationship. Hopefully,
the submissive will be wise enough to know that those limits will change,
grow, expand into new areas, or become unviable with exposure to interaction
in a relationship.
The reference to setting a standard and sticking to it, pertained to
looking at what character traits the submissive wants in a Dominant
partner. Does the sub want a person of honour, someone with humour,
a stern disciplinarian, any number of things that makes a person what
they are. These are the traits that make up the image of the "ideal"
we all carry around in our head.
It takes a fair amount of fortitude to stick to the standard of what
we want when we have been sifting through innumerable people looking
for the one that can quench the thirst to experience. And, it becomes
easier as time passes to step away from that standard and accept something
less. It has been my experience that when we accept something less we
plant the seed for future unhappiness.
Each of us, albeit unconsciously, constantly compares our partner to
that "ideal" image we carry around. Hopefully, the partner
we choose will measure up the standard we carry. When we find that our
partner is less than what we consider "ideal" the seed of
unhappiness may begin to grow.
I would hope that each of is wise
enough to know that there is no such thing as perfection nor a perfect
match, ever. The issue becomes one of how well we managed to match our
reality against our dream. How well we can accept what we have against
what we wanted. And how well we can reconcile the differences.
A goodly portion of just how much
reconciling we have to do is directly linked to how well we did the
job of matching a potential partner against our standards.
I wonder if it is not better that
we spend more time on the front end putting up with frustration and
disappointment in our search, than to weaken our standard and accept
something less and have less happiness in our future?
There is an old adage that all good
things come to those who wait. Perhaps a truer adage might be, all goods
things come to those who wait with a realistic standard and expectation.
©Reigen Du Coly
Seekers
home page